Abstract
We propose the construction of a ``Multiresolution Embedding Matrix", for
each time t of the time-series. Each row of this matrix are the three
last coefficients of a scale of an edge wavelet transform (Average
Interpolation construction method). This matrix contains frequency data
of the time-series up to
points.
Since we are using an
orthogonal wavelet transform, the last four points of the time series
can be perfectly reconstructed. As we go back in time past four points
the reconstruction gradually starts to remove the details of the
underlying series. The end result is a representation of the state of
the time-series that is very precise for recent points, but increasingly
generalized further back in time.
This matrix, M(t), can reconstruct the value of the point t. A learning mechanism such as a neural network can be used to learn the mapping between M(t) and M(t+1). However, we can exploit the fact that the rows of the matrix represent frequencies or processes on different scales, which is perhaps related to the continum of time horizons in financial markets. You do not have to worry about a huge dimensional mapping since we believe structure lies on individual time scales.
We demonstrate the use of this method to answer one of the key issues in time-series analysis - what is the ``best" time scale for predictions. Until recently most instruments were modeled with daily data, but now, high-frequency data is commonly available. We use the multiresolution embedding matrix to model the dynamics on each scale separately. In three separate examples we demonstrate how we can localize the predictable dynamics: 1) on a filtered logistic map (in the time domain), 2) on a series obtained through the evolution of wavelet coefficients, and 3) on the real-world problem of exchange rate prediction.
The following plots show some of the results we have obtained so far
using 30 minute DMark data that has been generously provided by Olsen
and Associates. The first plot shows an example of reconstruction
resulting from the use of edge wavelets It can be clearly seen that the
last few points, the ones that contain the most important information
for prediction, have been perfectly reconstructed, while points further
back gradually lose detail. In this example, the reconstruction
continues to closely track the signal for 1024 points while only
requiring 30 coefficients. The following two plots show predictability
versus scale for four years of the 30-minute DMark data. The results
were obtained by using linear prediction to predict the edge wavelet
coefficients needed for reconstruction of the next point in each scale
at time t+1 from the edge wavelet coefficients at time t. We see that
the daily scale has the most predictability.