Domestic Structures and European Integration. A multi-stage
two-level analysis of constitution building in the European Union
Referendums and Ratification
funded through the Third Call for proposals of the Key
Action 'Improving the Socio-economic Knowledge' of the European Union
(Project leader Thomas K”nig, University of Konstanz, Germany), Swiss
part funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Education and Science and
the Forschungsfonds of the University of St. Gallen.
Simon Hug
May 12, 2008
This project will study constitution-building in the European Union
using a multi-stage two-level-analysis of the Intergovernmental
Conference (IGC) to be concluded in 2006. We wish to answer two main
questions: How is the process of constitution-building carried out? How
can we explain the outcome of this process? Our project will relax
assumptions on unitary member-state preferences and one-shot processes
of constitution-building. We will examine the preparatory stage of
inter-ministerial coordination, the negotiation stage at the IGC, and
ratification in member states. We expect that the more non-unitary a
member state government is, the more likely is an IGC agreement.
However, we expect that when more alternatives for an agreement exist,
their successful ratification is more endangered. Using a multi-pronged
data gathering strategy, we will test these hypotheses and assess the
two-level character of inter-ministerial coordination, IGC negotiations
and domestic ratification.
This project explores constitution-building in the EU using a
multi-stage two-level-analysis. We expect inferences between the
domestic and European level during all stages because the constitution
intends to clarify the competencies between both levels. The
constitutional convent will make a proposal to be discussed in the
member states, and we will examine how member states form their
positions in inter-ministerial coordination. This analysis will indicate
the degree of member-state unitariness at the IGC, and we will ask
whether the degree of unitariness explains their negotiation performance
and outcome capacity. We expect that non-unitariness makes reaching
outcomes more likely, but ratification more difficult because neither
parties nor citizens support outcomes which diverge from their initial
positions.
Even though our topic provides support for the multi-stage
two-level character of the process, it is an ambitious empirical concern
to measure the preferences of all the actors involved. We attempt to
test our hypotheses using multi-pronged data gathering strategy. For the
preparatory stage, we will gather data by expert interviews in the
member states. For the negotiation stage, we will use an internet
survey, and for the ratification stage, we will use Eurobarometer and
party manifesto data to estimate party positions and populations'
attitudes. Our envisaged steps are:
i) identification of domestic procedures for inter-ministerial
coordination and ratification,
ii) identification of issues discussed at the IGC,
iii) development of questionnaire for interviews and the internet site,
iv) expert interviews within member states and with the Commission and
the EP,
v) internet survey of negotiating actors during/shortly after the IGC,
vi) use party manifesto and Eurobarometer data to estimate domestic
constraints,
vii) methodological evaluation of the instruments and data,
viii) examine competing approaches on constitution-building.
1 Publications
|
- Hug, Simon and
Thomas König, eds.Domestic structures and constitution-building in an
international organization. (special issue of the Review of
International Organizations (2007) 2(2).
- König , Thomas and Simon HugPolicy-making Processes and the European Constitution: A
Comparative Study of Member States and Accession Countries . (2006).
London: Routledge..
- Hug, Simon and Thomas König Domestic Structures and Constitution-Building in an
International Organization: Introduction Review of International
Organizations (2007) 2(2) 105-113.
- Hug, Simon and Tobias Schulz) Referendums in the EU's Constitution Building Process
Review of International Organizations (2007) 2(2) 177-218.
- Hug, Simon The Strategic Context of Referendums on the EU Constitution. in
Claes H. de Vreese (ed.) Referendum Campaigns 2007, Palgrave.
- Hug, Simon and Tobias Schulz Referendums in the EU's Constitution Building Process. in
Wilfried Marxer and Zoltán Tibor Pállinger and Bruno Kaufmann and Theo
Schiller (eds.) Direct Democracy in Europe - Current Position and
Research Prospects for the 21st Century 2007. Wiesbaden: VS
Verlag, 174-188.
- Hug, Simon and Thomas König Divided Government and the Ratification of the Amsterday
Treaty" in Robert Pahre (ed.) Democratic Foreign Policy Making:
Problems of Divided Government and International Cooperation 2006.
Palgrave, 133-150.
- König, Thomas and Simon
Hug Introduction in König, Thomas and Simon
Hug (eds.)
Policy-making Processes and the European Constitution: A Comparative
Study of Member States and Accession Countries . (2006).
London: Routledge.
- Hug, Simon and Thomas König Conclusion in König, Thomas and Simon Hug (eds.)
Policy-making Processes and the European Constitution: A Comparative
Study of Member States and Accession Countries . (2006).
London: Routledge. pp. 260-278.
- Hug, Simon Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der direkten Demokratie in der EU.
in Cheneval, Francis (ed.) Legitimationsgrundlagen der Europäischen
Union (2005). Berlin: Lit Verlag. pp. 411-431.
- Hug, Simon Gescheiterte Referenden, Gescheiterte Ratifikation? - Wege Aus
der Krise. Welttrends (2007) 2 53-61.
2 Work in Progress
|
- Hug, Simon Models of Multilateral Negotiations and Ratification
Paper prepared for presentation at the
ECPR General conference September 8-10, 2005 Budapest
- Hug, Simon Multilateral bargaining at the 2004 IGC: An empirical
assessment
Paper prepared for presentation at the ECPR
General Conference Pisa, September 6-8, 2007
File translated from
TEX
by
TTH,
version 3.12.
On 12 May 2008, 09:58.