Séminaire de Recherche en Linguistique
Ce séminaire reçoit des conférenciers invités spécialisés dans différents domaines de la linguistique. Les membres du Département, les étudiants et les personnes externes intéressées sont tous cordialement invités. Description du séminaire 
| Titre | Predictive structure and the learnability of inflectional paradigms: investigating whether low i-complexity benefits human learners and neural networks |
| Conférencier | Tamar Johnson (UNIGE) |
| Date | mardi 12 octobre 2021 |
| Heure | 12h15 |
| Salle | Salle L208 + Zoom (ID 698 5637 3355 PW 522522) changement de salle |
| Description |
Research on cross-linguistic differences in morphological paradigms reveals a wide range of variation on many dimensions, including the number of categories expressed, the number of unique forms, and the number of inflectional classes. This typological variation is surprising within the approach that languages evolve to maximise learnability (e.g., Christiansen and Chater 2008; Deacon 1998; Kirby 2002). Ackerman and Malouf (2013) argue that there is one dimension on which languages do not differ widely: in predictive structure. Predictive structure in a paradigm describes the extent to which forms predict each other, sometimes called i-complexity. Ackerman and Malouf (2013) show that although languages differ according to surface paradigm complexity measures, called e-complexity, they tend to have low i-complexity. Results show weak evidence for an effect of i-complexity on learning, with evidence for greater effects of e-complexity in both human and neural network learners. I-complexity was found to affect generalisation in both human and neural network learners, suggesting that i-complexity could, in principle, shape languages through the process of generalisation to unknown forms. I discuss the difference in the effects of i-complexity on learning and generalisation, the similarities between the effect of i-complexity in human learners and neural networks, and cases the two types of learner differed. Finally, I discuss the role that i-complexity is likely to have in language change based on the results. |
| Document(s) joint(s) |
- |