start
Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédenteProchaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
| start [2025/02/01 10:57] – [Seminars and conferences] g.m | start [2025/11/07 21:14] (Version actuelle) – g.m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 8: | Ligne 8: | ||
| Johannes Josi (February 2018). | Johannes Josi (February 2018). | ||
| - | Current members: Thomas Blomme, Francesca Carocci, Aloïs Demory, Gurvan Mével, [[Grigory Mikhalkin|Grigory Mikhalkin]], | + | Current members: Thomas Blomme, [[Grigory Mikhalkin|Grigory Mikhalkin]], |
| - | Alumni: Ivan Bazhov, Johan Bjorklund, Rémi Crétois, Weronika Czerniawska, | + | Alumni: Ivan Bazhov, Johan Bjorklund, Francesca Carocci, Rémi Crétois, Weronika Czerniawska, Aloïs Demory, Yi-Ning Hsiao, Jens Forsgard, Maxim Karev, Ilya Karzhemanov, |
| We organize several seminars: | We organize several seminars: | ||
| Ligne 29: | Ligne 29: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | Joé Brendel (ETHZ) | + | Enzo Pasquereau (Université de Nantes), Monday, Oct 13, 14h00, room 01-15 (Seminaire " |
| + | |||
| + | " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Abstract: Combinatorial patchworking is a powerful method used for constructing real algebraic hypersurfaces with controlled topology. I will discuss generalization of this method to higher codimension using real phase structure. | ||
| + | In codimension 2, we give explicit patchworking rules (based on triangulations, | ||
| + | As an application, | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| "Split tori in S^2 x S^2, billiards and ball-embeddability" | "Split tori in S^2 x S^2, billiards and ball-embeddability" | ||
| Abstract: In this talk we will discuss the symplectic classification of Lagrangian tori that split as circles in S^2 x S^2. As it turns out, this classification is equivalent to playing mathematical billiards on a rectangular table. This has many interesting applications, | Abstract: In this talk we will discuss the symplectic classification of Lagrangian tori that split as circles in S^2 x S^2. As it turns out, this classification is equivalent to playing mathematical billiards on a rectangular table. This has many interesting applications, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gurvan Mével (UNIGE), Wednesday, Feb 19, 14h00, room 1-07 (Seminaire " | ||
| + | |||
| + | "Floor diagrams and some tropical invariants in positive genus" | ||
| + | |||
| + | Abstract : Göttche-Schroeter invariants are a rational tropical refined invariant, i.e. a polynomial counting genus 0 curves on toric surfaces, that can be computed with a floor diagrams approach. In this talk I will explain that this approach extends in any genus. This gives new invariants, related to ones simultaneously defined by Shustin and Sinichkin. I will then say few words on a quadratically enriched (and not refined !) version of this extension. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Uriel Sinichkin (Tel-Aviv), Wednesday, Feb 5, 14h00, room 1-07 + Zoom (Seminaire " | ||
| + | |||
| + | " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Abstract: In this talk I will present a generalization of Goettche-Schroeter and Schroeter-Shustin refined counts of tropical curves that splits to a product of terms on small fragments of the curves. This count is invariant in each of the following situations: either genus at most one, or a single contact element, or point conditions in Mikhalkin position. I will compare our results to Mével’s floor diagram approach, and discuss the specialization of the count at q=1, which recovers certain characteristic numbers. | ||
| + | |||
| Thomas Blomme (Neuchâtel), | Thomas Blomme (Neuchâtel), | ||
start.1738403847.txt.gz · Dernière modification : de g.m
