Man His Brother's Keeper (1855)
AUTHOR: Alcott, William Andrus
PUBLICATION: “Man His Brother's Keeper.” The Friend of Virtue Vol. XVIII no. 15 (Aug 1855): 240-241. ProQuest, American Periodicals database. Subscription access.
KEYWORDS: animals, morality, women's rights
---. “Shooting Birds”
---. The Young Mother
Anderson, Martha Jane. Mount Lebanon Cedar Boughs
Bergh, Henry. “An Anthropozoonet”
---. Married Off.
---. “New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals”
Child, Lydia Maria. Isaac T. Hopper
---. History of the Philadelphia Bible-Christian Church for the First Century of its Existence
Freshel, M. R. L. The Golden Rule Cook Book
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. “The Automobile as a Reformer”
Grimké, Sarah Moore. Letters on the Equality of the Sexes
Howells, William Dean. Tuscan Cities
Kellogg, John Harvey. The Living Temple
Lovell, Mary Frances. “Address on Humane Education”
---. High School Ethics
---. “How Vegetarians Observe the Golden Rule”
---. The Law of Biogenesis
---. “The Logic of Vegetarianism”
---. “The Unconscious Holocaust”
---. The Universal Kinship
---. Unjust Laws Which Govern Woman
Stowe, Harriet Beecher. Palmetto-Leaves
---. “Rights of Dumb Animals”
SUMMARY (Ridvan Askin, edited Deborah Madsen):
The article advocates for animal welfare and women's rights. Alcott presents a general argument for the human duty of care towards fellow beings, including non-human animals. “All can care for all; all can keep all; all can take special care of the feeble” – this is the article's general argumentative thrust. However, Alcott also argues a more specific case, as he specifically urges men to care for women, just as humans care for non-human animals. “Man and woman were doubtless made to care for each other,” Alcott writes, “and even for the animals below them, to say nothing of things inanimate.” He continues with an analogy between women and domestic animals: “He who is to take care of a domestic dog, or cat or pig, and see that justice is done to him, and that he is uninjured as long at least, as he behaves well, is most undoubtedly to take care of woman. Is the obligation less imperative in the latter case than in the former? Most men virtually deny this” (240). A few lines later, Alcott adds: “If the meanest animal is in any sense our brother, we are to be his keeper, no matter whether male or female; no matter whether in sickness or health; no matter whether in life, health, or reputation. Good kings do not abuse their subjects. They do not murder them – in soul or body – in order to keep them.” Alcott concludes that, as “the Divinely appointed keepers of [their] sisters,” men should strive to support women as much as possible and in every respect, from questions of virtue to those of education, from economic to political matters.